Can $330M Man Bryce Harper Coexist with MLB’s Most Intense Manager?

CLEARWATER, FL - MARCH 11: Bryce Harper #3 of the Philadelphia Phillies talks to manager Gabe Kapler prior to a Grapefruit League spring training game against the Tampa Bay Rays at Spectrum Field on March 11, 2019 in Clearwater, Florida. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

B/R

PHILADELPHIA — The first day went well, and the second day went even better.

If Bryce Harper and the Philadelphia Phillies keep having days and weekends like the one they just had, no one will be asking whether his record-setting 13-year, $330 million contract was a huge mistake.

Three games into the season, Harper has two home runs and the Phillies are 3-0. One weekend in, Harper is right for Philadelphia, and Philadelphia is right for Harper. And the manager who attracted so much attention last year is right for him, too.

“I think it’s the perfect fit,” Phillies bench coach Rob Thomson said.

He was talking about Harper and Gabe Kapler, the second-year manager who can match Harper’s intensity, if not his $25-plus million annual average salary. It’s the relationship everyone will be watching, maybe more than any other manager-player relationship in the gamemaybe more than any relationship between any two people in baseball.

Harper attracts attention, as does Kapler. While both have their supporters, both have plenty of detractors, too. And for everyone inside the Phillies clubhouse who sees this as a match that will work, there’s someone on the outside equally convinced it won’t.

“I see issues,” said one National League executive familiar with Harper from his time with the Washington Nationals.

There are no issues for now, which is either a sign that Harper and Kapler are off to a great start or it’s still the honeymoon period in a marriage that came about when Harper agreed to terms with Philly on Feb. 28. They’ve only had four weeks of spring training and three regular-season wins together, all of which were filled with standing ovations and home runs and curtain calls.

There shouldn’t be problems yet, but it’s still notable how the two lead characters in this drama describe each other.

“He’s very genuine,” Harper said of Kapler. “He really cares about his players. A guy everyone on this team wants to play for.”

“He’s the kind of guy who is equipped for this moment,” Kapler said of Harper. “The biggest stage, the brightest lights. And he’s so smart.”

Harper's No. 3 jersey was everywhere at Citizens Bank Park on the opening weekend, including in the middle of Phillies celebrations.

Harper’s No. 3 jersey was everywhere at Citizens Bank Park on the opening weekend, including in the middle of Phillies celebrations.Drew Hallowell/Getty Images

Kapler, who believes in analytics but also believes in people, has gone against his usual thought that the best hitter on a team should bat second or fourth. Instead, he put Harper in the No. 3 position he often occupied during his seven seasons with the Nationals.

Harper, who likes coming up in the first inning and having runners on base, made clear that he wasn’t making demands about the lineup or anything else.

“It’s his job to be the manager, just like it’s my job to be a player,” he said. “If he would have hit me second or fourth, I would have been all for it.”

Kapler may be the boss in title, but the power dynamic is understood. Harper has the security of the longest contract in the game.

If Harper walked around the Phillies clubhouse like he owned it, no one could challenge him. But he doesn’t. He walks in like any other player, just one with more eyes on him. His locker looks like every other locker.

And when he was celebrating the three wins over the division-champion Atlanta Braves that began this Phillies season, he looked very much to be part of a team.

It’s a team with more talent and more veteran leadership than Kapler’s 2018 Phillies. While the talent and the money spent have plenty of people around MLB saying Kapler is already on the hot seat, the influx of respected veterans like outfielder Andrew McCutchen should give him a better chance to succeed.

“It kind of gets the load off him, because you’ve got more veteran guys in the clubhouse who are able to manage the clubhouse,” McCutchen said. “We’re able to hold each other accountable. It’s not like he has to go out of his way to do it. His job is to manage. He can go and focus on the things he needs to focus on because he knows the guys in this clubhouse are going to take care of each other.”

That wasn’t always true in 2018, when a young Phillies team spent 39 days in first place but faded over the season’s final month and finished below .500 at 80-82. The clubhouse issues were significant enough that veteran first baseman Carlos Santana smashed a television after he saw some of his teammates using it to play Fortnite during games, according to ESPN.com’s Jeff Passan.

Santana didn’t blame Kapler, telling Passan: “I like Gabe because he’s a very strong guy. It was tough for him, especially his first year. But sometimes the manager can’t control the clubhouse because everybody [is] doing their thing.”

Kapler's first year in Philadelphia was a mixture of good and bad, on the field and off.

Kapler’s first year in Philadelphia was a mixture of good and bad, on the field and off.Mitchell Leff/Getty Images

Ultimately, the manager is responsible not only for how his team plays, but also for how it acts. The 2019 Phillies are expected both to play and act better.

“Gabe is so smart,” Thomson said. “Everybody makes mistakes, but you very rarely see Gabe make the same mistake twice.”

Kapler has evolved over the past year. While his belief in the numbers can still frustrate some traditionalistshe used seven pitchers in Saturday’s 8-6 winKapler has adjusted to the team and players he has now. He has vowed to have more of a set lineup, for example.

“Last year, we really had to look at every strategic advantage, and so with the lineup, we often factored that in,” Kapler said. “This year, because our lineup is going to be very good naturally and because there’s going to be some consistency to it, we’re thinking about how can we make our guys most comfortable. I know Bryce likes hitting in the 3-4 area. I know Rhys [Hoskins] likes hitting in the 3-4 area. I know McCutchen is very comfortable in the 1 spot.

“If these guys are comfortable, my inclination is that they’re going to perform better.”

That goes for all his players, but Kapler has even more incentive to keep Harper comfortable and get him performing at his best. Because if Harper’s playing well, he gives the Phillies the best chance to win.

While his past few seasons were marred by a mix of injuries and disappointing statistics, Harper is still the guy who produced one of the best offensive seasons in MLB history when he hit 42 home runs with a 1.109 OPS in 2015.

The Phillies didn’t sign Harper solely for his impact on the field, but also because “he’s part of the brand we’re building,” Kapler said. Last week, Major League Baseball announced Harper’s Phillies jersey is already the best-seller in the game. The team also set records for most jerseys sold in the first 24 and 48 hours after Harper signed.

Eventually, winning has to go along with the marketing. It’s Kapler’s job to make sure Harper and his other stars do enough of that.

Harper-inspired merchandise has been moving at a brisk pace since the six-time All-Star signed with Philadelphia in March.

Harper-inspired merchandise has been moving at a brisk pace since the six-time All-Star signed with Philadelphia in March.Matt Rourke/Associated Press

“I’ve always thought the best way to get the most out of a player is by doing two things,” Kapler said. “The first one is supporting them like crazy, and the other one is challenging them like crazy. Sometimes you have veteran, established top-of-the-line players who probably don’t get enough of the challenge.

“People are afraid to have the conversation with them. And I think Bryce really welcomes that.”

Some who knew him with the Nationals may disagree. An NL executive familiar with his time there describes Harper not as a bad guy, but said “he’s a bit of a diva.” Coaches, he said, were sometimes told to approach him with kid gloves.

Kapler’s goal is to build a strong enough relationship with his star that issues can be discussed out loud, not in hushed tones anonymously.

“I don’t think you can raise the bar or challenge them or ask for more without first devoting yourself to the support component,” Kapler said. “Right now, all of my attention is going to be focused on supporting Bryce and observing Bryce. In order to support and challenge someone, you have to get to know them. My first job is to establish a relationship with Bryce and letting him know I want to know the person and not just the baseball player. I don’t think players can be as good at their jobs as they can be if they’re only being thought of as a number on a jersey.”

In Harper’s case, part of that is understanding the scrutiny he has been under since Sports Illustrated dubbed him “Baseball’s LeBron” and put him on its cover as a 16-year-old in 2009. Everything he has said or done since has been analyzed and overanalyzed, which may make him more prepared than most to deal with the pressures of a $330 million contract.

Kapler may be better prepared than most managers, too. While he was never the player Harper is, he did come to the major leagues in 1999 as the Detroit Tigers‘ top prospect. He didn’t have Harper’s talent, but they approach the game in a similar way, looking for every edge and never giving an inch.

Kapler has also been around big contracts before. While with the Rangers in 2001, he watched Alex Rodriguez deal with the pressure of joining a new team with a then-record 10-year, $252 million contract.

Like Harper, A-Rod was liked and hated and scrutinized. Even the smallest comment could become an issue.

Take what happened shortly after Harper signed with the Phillies. In a radio interview, he said he would do what he could to convince Mike Trout to sign with the Phillies (Trout later signed a contract extension with the Los Angeles Angels). As a result, the Angels complained that Harper may have violated the sport’s tampering laws. When reporters asked Harper about that, one suggested he may have been “called into the principal’s office.”

“I’ve never been called into the principal’s office,” Harper responded. “I don’t really know what that means. I’m not sure what you’re trying to ask.”

One National League executive saw the exchange on television and took it as Harper questioning why he would ever need to submit to authority. But a former major league player watching the same exchange had the opposite reaction.

“I don’t think people realize what a good kid Bryce was,” the former player said. “I mean, I knew the principal’s office in every school I was in because I was always sent there. I doubt Bryce ever was.”

Some will scoff at Harper’s answer. Nor did everyone believe Harper when he said he was happy to see Trout top his record contract days after he set the mark. Or that he was thrilled to go to Philadelphia, or to sign a contract with no opt-outs. That’s the way it is when you are more than a playerwhen you are a brand unto yourself.

And as long as he and Kapler are both in Phillies uniforms, some people will always doubt that the relationship will work.

For now, though, it is working. Everything about Harper and the Phillies is working, even in unexpected ways.

“The last week of spring training, we sent Bryce to the minor league camp to get some at-bats,” Thomson said. “I get a text from the field coordinator saying, ‘I’ve just seen one of the best things I’ve ever seen. He hit a ground ball to second base, and he ran as hard as anyone we’ve had in camp run to first base. So now, we can tell everyone in camp: If that guy can do it, you can do it.’

“That’s what you’ve got.”

That’s what the Phillies have. It’s Kapler’s job to make sure that’s the Harper people think of.

      

Danny Knobler covers Major League Baseball as a national columnist for Bleacher Report.

Follow Danny on Twitter and talk baseball.

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2YLoUag
via IFTTT

It: Chapter Two unveils ‘scary as hell’ first footage at CinemaCon

Pennywise is back.

The highly anticipated horror sequel It: Chapter Two unveiled its first look at CinemaCon on Tuesday. A follow-up to 2017’s box office smash based on the Stephen King novel of the same name, the sequel follows “The Losers Club” 27 years after the events of the first film.

Set in the present day, the club reunites in accordance with their blood oath to fight the evil clown Pennywise a second time. Older versions of the kids from the 1980s-set first film will be portrayed by the likes of James McAvoy and Jessica Chastain in this sequel, though the younger versions will also appear in memory and flashback sequences.

Returning director Andy Muschietti kicked off the presentation by sauntering out on stage with his face hidden behind a familiar pyramid of red balloons. After apologizing for not being Bill Skarsgard (who returns as the nightmarish Pennywise), Muschietti then welcomed the entire Losers Club to the stage, both the kids and their adult counterparts: Isaiah Mustafa and Chosen Jacobs as Mike Hanlon, Jay Ryan and Jeremy Ray Taylor as Ben Hanscom, Andy Bean and Wyatt Oleff as Stan Uris, James Ransone and Jack Dylan Grazer as Eddie Kaspbrak, Chastain and Sophia Lillis as Beverly Marsh, and Bill Hader and Finn Wolfhard as Richie Tozier.

Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for CinemaCon

The only one missing was Jaeden Martell, who plays the younger version of Bill Denbrough. McAvoy, who plays the elder Bill, joked about Martell’s absence, telling the audience, “He’s too talented and he threatens me, so I made him disappear.”

Wolfhard (Stranger Things) told the crowd that although he didn’t initially expect a sequel to be made, he still lobbied for Hader to play the adult Richie. Hader joked that it was Wolfhard’s recommendation that landed him the gig.

“I was like, well, Richie’s funny to himself,” Wolfhard told the audience.

“Yeah, Richie thinks he’s funny,” Hader replied. “It’s like, who’s an a–hole who thinks he’s funny? Who laughs at his own jokes a lot?”

The first footage shown at CinemaCon focuses on an adult Beverly Marsh, who returns to her old home in Derry. She knocks on the door and is greeted by a kind-looking elderly lady named Mrs. Kersh (a name book readers will remember). Mrs. Kersh informs Beveryl that her father has passed away, but she is still welcome to look around.

Beverly goes through the home, and the lady asks if it’s as she remembered it. “Cleaner,” Beverly replies, as she finds the old postcard Ben gave her all those years ago, telling her, “Your hair is like winter fire.” While Beverly reminisces, behind her, a figure is seen being dragged into a room.

As Beverly drinks tea with the elderly lady, she notices something isn’t quite right with her old — there are flies everywhere and there’s something unsettling about the owner.

“You know what they say about Derry — no one who dies here ever really dies,” the lady says, before freezing in a glazed smile. Beverly notices photos of the lady’s family on the walls, all of which look about a century old, with her father bearing a very close resemblance to the demented smile of a certain red-haired supernatural clown that tormented the Losers as kids.

Things quickly go awry as the old lady strips naked and comes for Beverly, saying, “I was always a daddy’s girl. Are you a daddy’s girl, Beverly?”

The rest of the footage follows the now-adult Losers as they return to Derry, with flashback scenes of them as kids.  (There’s also a haunting shot of the entire adult Losers Club seeing their child reflections in a mirrored store window.) But Pennywise’s influence is everywhere, as Derry devolves into chaos and red balloons keep popping up. The final shot is of Pennywise himself, looking exactly the same as he did all those years ago and addressing the camera with a sinister “hello.”

Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images for CinemaCon

While the footage was brief, the overarching sense was that the first look at the sequel lived up to its frightening predecessor, with audience social media reactions describing it as “bloody” and “scary.” See below for a series of reactions to the footage.

The film debuts Sept. 6.

Additional reporting by Devan Coggan and Piya Sinha-Roy.

Related Links:

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2HVq6CQ
via IFTTT

Saudi Arabia gave Jamal Khashoggi’s children homes, money: Report

Saudi Arabia has given the four children of slain journalist Jamal Khashoggi “million-dollar houses” and “monthly five-figure payments” as compensation for the killing of their father, the Washington Post reported.

The kingdom is trying to come to a long-term understanding with the Khashoggi family members to encourage them to continue to refrain from criticism in relation to their father’s killing by Saudi agents, the paper reported on Monday. 

Larger payouts – “possibly tens of millions of dollars apiece” – as part of “blood money” negotiations could be offered in the coming months, the paper said, citing accounts by current and former Saudi officials as well as people close to the family.

Negotiations over further payments are expected to take place following the trials of Khashoggi’s accused killers, according to the officials and others who spoke to the paper on the condition of anonymity.

Saudi operatives killed Khashoggi, a Washington Post contributor who was living in the United States, on October 2, 2018, at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, where he had gone to collect documents for his planned wedding.

A critic of the Saudi government and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS, Khashoggi had resisted pressure from Riyadh to return home.

His body, which Turkish officials say was dismembered, is yet to be found. 

‘Big injustice’

MBS has been accused of ordering the operation to kill Khashoggi, but the kingdom has rejected the claim. 

The Post’s report on Monday quoted a former Saudi official saying King Salman Abdulaziz Al Saud approved the “delivery of homes and monthly payments of $10,000 or more to each sibling” in 2018 as an acknowledgement that “a big injustice has been done” and a bid “to make a wrong, right”.

A current official told the Post the payments were in line with the long-standing Saudi custom of providing financial assistance to victims of crime.

“Such support is part of our custom and culture,” the official said. Dismissing the suggestion the family would be obligated to remain silent, he said the payments are “not attached to anything else”.

The houses given to the Khashoggi children are located in the Saudi city of Jeddah, in a compound where their eldest brother Salah lives. The properties are part of an initial settlement and are worth as much as $4m apiece, the Post reported. 

Salah Khashoggi, a banker, plans to remain in Saudi Arabia, while the other three children live in the United States and “are expected to sell their new Saudi properties”, the Post said. 

Salah is leading the financial discussions with Saudi authorities, according to the paper, and his desire to remain in Jeddah with his family has “contributed to the siblings’ deference to the authorities and caution in their public statements over the past six months”.

‘No dissident’ 

In an opinion piece for the Post last November, Salah’s sisters Norah and Razan wrote while their father “grieved for the home he had left”, he “never abandoned hope for his country”.

He was “no dissident”, they wrote. The essay did not address who killed Khashoggi. 

In November, the Saudi public prosecutor indicted 11 unnamed suspects over Khashoggi’s killing. Five of the suspects could face the death penalty on charges of “ordering and committing the crime”.

If the men are convicted, that could pave the way for the Khashoggi family members to accept financial compensation as an alternate punishment. It is not clear whether the family would have to pardon the killers to get the money.

Such an agreement could also close the case under Saudi law, without MBS or senior aides believed to be involved in the killing, facing a trial. 

Aidan White, director of the US-based Ethical Journalism Network, described the initial payments to Khashoggi’s children as one of a “variety of methods by Saudi Arabia to avoid taking responsibility” for his murder. 

Saudi authorities were also “applying secrecy in the trial process” and ignoring international standards of justice, he said.

“The elephant in the room is the United States’s failure to stand up alongside other democratic governments condemning what has happened in the Khashoggi case and demanding the Saudi government be more open and respect international standards of justice,” White said, referring to US President Donald Trump’s support for Saudi Arabia and the crown prince. 

Trump said in November: “It could very well be that the crown prince had knowledge of this tragic event – maybe he did and maybe he didn’t.”

In February, Trump refused to provide US Congress with a report determining who killed Khashoggi.

Saudi officials describe the murder as a rogue operation that went wrong carried out by a team that intended to return Khashoggi to Riyadh. 

Saud al-Qahtani, a top aide to MBS, was part of the team and was dismissed soon after Khashoggi’s killing, although the crown prince reportedly continued to take advice from him as recently as January. 

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2I7kYKZ
via IFTTT

‘Zion Was the Breaking Point’: Why U.S. Senator Called for NCAA to Pay Players

DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA - FEBRUARY 20: (EDITORS NOTE: Retransmission with alternate crop.) Zion Williamson #1 of the Duke Blue Devils reacts after falling as his shoe breaks in the first half of the game against the North Carolina Tar Heels at Cameron Indoor Stadium on February 20, 2019 in Durham, North Carolina. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

Streeter Lecka/Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Long before he was Senator Chris Murphy, D-Conn., he was Commissioner Chris Murphy. When he was 10 or 11, Murphy formed a fantasy football league with his friends in middle school. This was in the days before the internet, of course, so he would spend hours putting together giant draft boards and writing out the available players at every position. In high school, he turned his attention to the NCAA tournament.

As a freshman and sophomore in high school, he ran a March Madness pool that he says attracted a couple hundred entries each year. Each night of the tournament, he’d sit in front of the stack of papers and tally the results by hand. “And there was no money involved!” he exclaims in mock exaggeration. He says there’s no money involved in this year’s office pool among his Senate staff either, and that’s a good thing for Murphy. He picked Michigan State, Gonzaga, Tennessee and UNC to reach the Final Four and finds himself 23rd out of 32 entries.

Murphy’s mind is on the NCAA for more reasons than just the Madness. Last Thursday, the first day of the Sweet 16, he released a report calling on the NCAA to pay its athletes. Later that day, Bleacher Report sat down with Murphy in his Senate office to discuss why he views player compensation as a civil rights issue, how Congress could get involved and what he sees for the future of college sports. (The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.)

The NCAA did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

 

Bleacher Report: Zion Williamson was mentioned at the top of your report. Does your interest in the issue go back further than that?

Chris Murphy: I’ve been angry about this for a while. Zion’s injury and all the conversation around it prompted me to decide to finally put out this report that I’ve been noodling over for years. I couldn’t help but notice that this industry has gotten so big and so profitable in a really short period of time. I pay attention to the TV contracts that get signed. There’s no way around the fact that there are more and more people making millions of dollars off a sport that’s supposed to be amateur.

Zion was the breaking point for me. One kid slipping on the court caused Nike’s market valuation to drop a billion dollars. No amateur unpaid athlete—no amateur unpaid worker—should have that kind of impact on an industry.

     

B/R: What would a legislative option look like to address player compensation?

Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) believes the NCAA's policy of not financially compensating athletes is a civil rights violation.

Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) believes the NCAA’s policy of not financially compensating athletes is a civil rights violation.Susan Walsh/Associated Press

CM: I think it’s too early to know what that is. This is much better done by the NCAA. And I’m not alone—there’s a growing level of discomfort inside and outside the political arena about how students are being treated. But they’ve got some real antitrust issues. It’s not clear to me how they continue to survive court challenges when they’re the only game in town. At the very least, it seems crazy that these kids can’t make any money off their own branding and likeness. There’s been legislation put forward in the House of Representatives to give them ability to at least make money off their own personas’ being marketed. There’s some merit to that.

But I’ve met with the NCAA. They’ve sat right here. They know how I feel. I’d like to give them the chance to make this right or chart a path to making this right before we introduce legislation in the Senate.

      

B/R: Is it enough of a fix just to let players profit from their names and likenesses, or would you ultimately want to see them paid too?

CM: I’m being careful not to set the boundaries for what’s an acceptable solution. I’d love to see the NCAA try. They’re not even trying. Once the NCAA moves forward with some options, we can evaluate what makes sense. Obviously, letting kids make money off their licensing or merchandising would only benefit a handful of players. The LSU linemen are probably not going to make a lot of money off their jerseys being sold, but they’re just as much a part of the moneymaking operation as the quarterback and the running back are.

     

B/R: Of course, a player like Zion would make more money than just about anyone else in college basketball. But that LSU lineman could sell his autograph to boosters, right? That’s more money than they can get right now.

CM: I think there’s a legitimate question if you want to put all these kids in business for themselves or whether you want to guarantee them all some basic share of the profits. If the new system is entirely reliant on merchandising, then that puts an enormous business burden on the kids. That may be the right way to go, but there also may be a way to share the profits without requiring each student to become their own personal LLC.

      

B/R: Have you given some thought to the Title IX implications of paying players?

CM: It’s one of the many interesting and complicated questions about how a compensation scheme would ultimately be arranged. There’s lots of really complicated questions that you have to get beyond, and Title IX is one of them. But the existing system is complicated and convoluted, and everybody except for the kids gets paid from that system. I’m sure we can figure it out.

While Sen. Murphy said figuring out the Title IX implications of paying college athletes is one of many complicated questions that would need to be answered, the income a team like the UConn women's team generates demonstrates the need to answer them for all college athletes.

While Sen. Murphy said figuring out the Title IX implications of paying college athletes is one of many complicated questions that would need to be answered, the income a team like the UConn women’s team generates demonstrates the need to answer them for all college athletes.Stephen Dunn/Associated Press/Associated Press

And you know, in my state, the women make as much, if not more, for the state than the men do. The women are pretty profitable in the state of Connecticut. (Editor’s note: According to UConn’s annual financial statement to the NCAA, both basketball teams at UConn operated at a deficit in 2018, although the women lost less money overall.)

      

B/R: You described the NCAA as the only game in town. Do you agree with Judge Claudia Wilken’s decision last month that said schools were violating antitrust law by refusing to pay their athletes above and beyond their scholarships?

CM: The NCAA is a monopoly. It uses its monopoly powers super-effectively in order to make a small handful of adults super-rich at the expense of kids. It uses its monopoly power to keep the profits from the kids who are, by the way, largely black—in football and basketball—and enrich a small handful of adults who are, by the way, largely white. That’s why this is an issue of monopoly power and also an issue of civil rights.

    

B/R: Is the racial aspect of this what makes it a civil rights issue to you, or is it because of the labor aspects of it? This is America, and people aren’t being paid for their labor?

CM: It’s both. You’ve got people not being compensated for their labor, so that’s a civil rights issue. This is also a civil rights issue because of the racial composition of the players being very different than the racial composition of the coaches and the CEOs of those sports businesses that are making lots of money.

    

B/R: It was interesting that you spent time in the report talking about the money being spent on facilities. It seems like you believe schools are prioritizing other ways to spend their money instead of paying players.

CM: It’s one of the things that got me interested in the subject, watching this race to the absurd that’s happening with football facilities that will soon become the norm for basketball facilities. We’re just seeing the beginning of this. Clemson may have the most ludicrous facility today (Ed. note: The $55 million football operations center includes a miniature golf course, playground slide and bowling alley), but UConn will have one in 10 years. If you’re going to compete, you have to have the bells and whistles that speak to 18-year-old kids. … I don’t know how that’s connected to the academic mission of the institution of the athletic mission of the institution.

It just becomes this race to the top—or the bottom, depending on how you look at it—that no school will be able to avoid. And this report doesn’t get into that dynamic as much, but future reports will. That’s another important piece of the story. The pressure that is put on UConn to act like Alabama to compete is really damaging. Georgia State raised fees on every single student in order to pay for their Division I programming because they didn’t make enough money off the licensing fees and ticket sales. They asked all their students to pay more simply for the privilege of having a decent sports program.

     

B/R: Is the timing of this report from you related to the ongoing FBI investigation into illegal payments to high school basketball recruits?

CM: There’s a lot of contributing factors to this breaking point arriving. Everyone knows—and has known for years—that college basketball recruiting is often a cesspool. There are a lot of different entry points to this debate, and it seemed the right time to introduce it to the Senate.

     

B/R: It’s an interesting position for you to be in because the Department of Justice has argued in court that the schools are being defrauded by these payments to high school players. The fact that those defendants were found guilty or pleaded guilty was a win for the NCAA’s definition of amateurism.

CM: Most of the scandals you hear about connected to college sports cast the students as the villain. It’s always the students who have run afoul of these byzantine rules. Now there are exceptions to that—UNC—but the kids are not to blame here. They’re stuck in a system in which it’s hard to follow the rules, and there’s lots of reasons to be pretty envious of everyone else, who are making money at your expense.

    

B/R: Given everything else that is happening in our country right now, why press on this issue now?

CM: This is not the most important issue that America faces today. I’m fully cognizant of that. But to me … it’s another example of where a wealthy power structure has made themselves rich at the expense of people who have been purposefully denied adequate compensation.

As coaches such as Rick Pitino have made exorbitant salaries, players do not receive what they rightly should given the value they generate for schools, argues Murphy.

As coaches such as Rick Pitino have made exorbitant salaries, players do not receive what they rightly should given the value they generate for schools, argues Murphy.Robert Franklin/Associated Press

I think there are all sorts of industries in which the rich are getting a lot richer and the haves are getting a lot more and the have-nots are getting left behind. To me, this speaks to a broader problem in society whereby a very small handful of folks in America are rigging the rules for their benefit. Coaches and these apparel company CEOs and the broadcast executives are rigging the rules to enrich themselves. That’s happening in other parts of our economy.

A lot of people care about this sport who don’t care about politics. And maybe it’s a way to talk about civil rights and social justice to folks who don’t always care or pay attention to those issues.

      

B/R: Looking forward, how would you like for college sports to look?

CM:  I don’t know that I want college sports to get much bigger than they are today. I hope that college sports don’t become even more dominant on campus, and I say that as a big college sports fan. And I hope we find some way to adequately compensate the players, and there are a million ways to do that. I hope we’re not sitting here today 10 years from now with parents of athletes in the NCAA tournament not being able to afford plane tickets to see their kids play.

      

B/R: Should we separate colleges from athletics?

CM: I love college sports. Less so today, but for a long period of my life, my emotions rose and fell depending on how the UConn basketball team was doing. I wouldn’t trade that for the world. There’s a sense of state patriotism that comes from following college athletics. You get tied to your state in a totally nonpartisan way because of your love for the University of Alabama or UCLA. It brings Republicans and Democrats together. The last thing I want to do is to tear down this country’s love affair with college sports. I think it does way more good than harm. This, in the grand scheme of things, is a minor adjustment. And the NCAA is wrong to suggest this would crash down their model. You can find a way to do right by students, and people will still show up out of allegiance for Michigan-Ohio State.

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2WHQx1X
via IFTTT

Joaquin Phoenix mires the tragedy of Joker in new teaser trailer

Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker is a tale mired in the tragedy of a man beaten down by the world, as revealed in the first teaser trailer for director Todd Phillips’ upcoming Warner Bros. DC movie based on one of the most iconic villains in comic book history.

“There’s been a lot of chatter about what this film is and what it isn’t and most of it is not accurate,” Philips told the audience of movie theater owners at CinemaCon in Las Vegas on Tuesday. “But it’s expected when you set out to make an origin story about a beloved character who basically has no definitive origin,” he added.

The trailer, which will be released online on Wednesday, shows Phoenix’s Arthur Fleck as a dejected man stumbling through the streets of Gotham. “My mother always tells me to smile and put on a happy face — she told me I had a purpose to bring laughter and joy to the world,” he says over a montage of him trying to spread happiness while dressed as a clown promoting a store when a group of thugs steal his sign and beat him up. In between shots of him dancing with his ailing mother and with Zazie Beetz‘s Sophie Dumond in a diner, you see Arthur begin his slow spiral into one of Gotham’s most dangerous, psychotic criminals as he sits inside a comedy club where he emits a more deranged laugh, then starts to carry out crimes in a clown mask. “Gotham’s lost its way,” Arthur says as he emerges as the Joker, dancing in a red suit with his trademark clown makeup. “What kind of coward would do something that cold-blooded?” a cop asks, as another replies, “Someone who hides behind a mask.”

Here’s a sampling of how the CinemaCon crowd reacted to the first footage:

Earlier on Tuesday, the first poster for the film was unveiled. Joker hits theaters Oct. 4.

Related content:

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2uJ9plf
via IFTTT

Lori Lightfoot Wins Race for Chicago Mayor

CHICAGO — Chicago became the largest American city ever to elect a black woman as its mayor as voters on Tuesday chose Lori Lightfoot, a former prosecutor, to replace Rahm Emanuel. When she takes office in May, Ms. Lightfoot also will be the city’s first openly gay mayor.

Ms. Lightfoot, who has never held elective office, easily won the race, overwhelming a better-known, longtime politician and turning her outsider status into an asset in a city with a history of corruption and insider dealings. Ms. Lightfoot, 56, beat Toni Preckwinkle, a former alderman who is president of the Cook County Board and who had for years been viewed as a highly formidable candidate for mayor.

For Chicago, Ms. Lightfoot’s win signaled a notable shift in the mood of voters and a rejection of an entrenched political culture that has more often rewarded insiders and dismissed unknowns. For many voters, the notion that someone with no political ties might become mayor of Chicago seemed an eye-opening counterpoint to a decades-old, often-repeated mantra about this city’s political order: “We don’t want nobody nobody sent.”

As Ms. Lightfoot took the stage in a downtown ballroom on Tuesday night, she acknowledged the unlikeliness of her resounding victory, in which she appeared to win all 50 of Chicago’s wards. “We were up against powerful interests, a powerful machine and a powerful mayor,” she said. “Nobody gave us much of a chance.”

For some of Ms. Lightfoot’s supporters, the significance of her victory was monumental, going beyond a single candidate or city. “Look, nothing personal, but it’s not the good old boys club anymore,” said Kimberly Smith, 40, who was born and raised on the South Side and said she thought the election marked a turning point in Chicago politics. “I feel empowered.”

National advocates for gay rights celebrated Ms. Lightfoot’s win. “Now young queer women and women of color can see themselves reflected in a position of major political leadership,” said Stephanie Sandberg, executive director of LPAC, an organization that works to build the political power of L.G.B.T.Q. women.

Ms. Lightfoot’s rise was unexpected only weeks ago, when 13 other candidates were vying to run the nation’s third-largest city, many of them far better known — with decades of experience in Chicago politics and with dynastic names like Daley. Ms. Lightfoot is a lawyer who has served in appointed positions, including as head of the Chicago Police Board and as a leader of a task force that issued a scathing report on relations between the Chicago police and black residents, but she was not widely known around the city until recent months.

Ms. Lightfoot — Chicago’s 56th mayor — arrives at a pivotal moment for a Democratic city that has for the past eight years been led by Mr. Emanuel, who surprised many residents when he chose not to seek re-election.

Chicago, a city of 2.7 million residents, is wrestling with dueling realities: Tech jobs and convention business have poured into its shimmering downtown while public schools have been shuttered on the South and West Sides, and thousands of black residents have moved away. Mr. Emanuel’s administration made strides to shore up the city’s fiscal woes but residents have complained about mounting taxes and fees. Chicago’s new mayor still must come up with an additional $1 billion in the next four years to continue pulling the city out of a pension crisis.

And the city says its crime problems have been improving over the past two years, recording about half as many murders this year as it did during the same period in 2016. Still, gun and gang violence are pervasive and the city had more than 550 homicides in 2018, more than in the nation’s two larger cities, New York and Los Angeles.

Race has often played an outsize role in politics in Chicago, which is essentially evenly split between white, black and Latino residents. On Tuesday, though, the contest between two African-American women scrambled the usual political calculus, or what one Chicagoan, Ra Joy, described as its habit of “tribal voting,” in which politicians count on support from voters of their own race.

In February, during the most crowded mayoral primary in city history, Ms. Lightfoot and Ms. Preckwinkle topped a far larger array of candidates of various ethnicities, races and genders, removing all the others from Tuesday’s runoff. That left political alignments few Chicagoans had seen before: Ms. Lightfoot pursuing white voters on the city’s Northwest and Southwest Sides; both women seeking black voters from a base on the South Side that had leaned toward a different black candidate in February; parts of Chicago’s North Side lakefront loaded with signs for Ms. Lightfoot.

Some residents said the history-making nature of the election was energizing while others seemed nonchalant, perhaps partly because Chicago has seen similar milestones. In 1983, the city picked its first black mayor, Harold Washington, in a racially charged election; a term before that, in 1979, the city chose its first female mayor, Jane Byrne.

“It’s not as shocking as it was back then, so that’s wonderful progress,” Kathy Byrne, the daughter of Jane Byrne, who died in 2014, said of the historic nature of this year’s election. “Why it’s taken so long? I don’t know.”

In many ways, the election transformed into a referendum on Chicago’s political culture, known for its miserable ranking on most measures of corruption, its political machine and its habit of keeping family dynasties in power.

Ms. Lightfoot, who was partner at a prominent law firm, Mayer Brown, portrayed her newcomer status as a sign of strength, pledging to dismantle City Hall’s old political ways and to “bring in the light.” Still, her claim of being an outsider was questioned by some younger activists in the city, who pointed to her jobs in the Richard M. Daley administration and as a police oversight official during Mr. Emanuel’s tenure, not to mention her role as a prosecutor.

Ms. Preckwinkle, the longtime Cook County board president, had tried to cast her experience as essential for managing a city the size of Chicago, while simultaneously reminding voters that she had — when she was first elected as an alderman years ago — regularly bucked the political establishment.

But as the election season played out, impatience over political corruption seemed to intensify among voters, in part because a major corruption scandal was unfolding at City Hall. Federal authorities have accused the City Council’s longest-serving alderman, Ed Burke, of running an old-school shakedown, even as the local news media reported that a second alderman had cooperated with the authorities, secretly recording his conversations at City Hall for months.

Of the city’s 50 aldermen, 15 seats were up for runoff elections on Tuesday. Mr. Burke, who has denied any wrongdoing, won re-election to another term in February, winning a margin large enough to avoid a runoff.

Rarely does this city get new, unexpected mayors. So Chicagoans watched with curiosity and uncertainty about what a Lightfoot administration would truly look like. Ms. Lightfoot has portrayed herself as a progressive, who promised to usher in a new era of accountability and transparency at City Hall. At times, she seemed to be running against Chicago politics in the public imagination: A television ad used an image of a smoke-filled room and spoke darkly of the “Chicago machine.”

Ms. Lightfoot has spoken frequently of equity and inclusion, of redistributing city funds to spread the prosperity of downtown and the North Side to neighborhoods that have been neglected.

“It’s unacceptable, the condition of our communities on the South and West Sides,” she said during the campaign. “The only way we are going to carve a new path for the city, to take us in a direction that our communities don’t continue to be resource-starved, is to vote for change.”

Ms. Lightfoot favors an elected school board, which would take power away from her own office. (Currently, the mayor appoints members of the school board.)

She has vowed to significantly change the Chicago Police Department, increasing training and reducing officer misconduct.

But her answers to the urgent question of how the city will pay its staggering bills have not been comprehensive.

Ms. Lightfoot has said that she will help the city meet its financial commitments by legalizing recreational marijuana and building a casino in Chicago. But she has not explained fully how she would solve the city’s imminent pension crisis.

“Whoever is elected as mayor is going to face a very difficult financial situation,” said Laurence Msall, the president of the Civic Federation, a watchdog group.

For Abraham Lacy, 33, a Chicagoan who voted for Ms. Lightfoot’s opponent on the South Side on Tuesday, the city’s urgent challenges of finances, schools and crime called for someone with deep experience.

“It’s tough to have someone new come in when you have this many things going on,” Mr. Lacy said.

In the end, though, many voters said they were driven more by their perceptions about politics than about policy. Ms. Lightfoot, her supporters said, offered the promise of a new order and a rejection of the politics of a generation ago.

“It’s because of Chicago,” Deepti Pareenja, 37, said, after casting her ballot on the city’s Northwest Side for Ms. Lightfoot. “We have a history of corruption with people who’ve been ingrained in politics for multiple decades.”

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2FKUe04
via IFTTT

Evan Peters says he won’t be in the next season of American Horror Story

He’s been through the Murder House, the Asylum, the Freak Show, and more, but after the Apocalypse, Evan Peters is ready to take a break from American Horror Story. (After all that, it’s safe to say he’s earned one.)

In an interview at WonderCon, the actor said he would “sit a season out,” confirming he will not appear in the upcoming ninth season. Peters has appeared in every previous iteration of the FX anthology.

Details are sparse about AHS‘ next season, though Emma Roberts is confirmed to return with Olympian Gus Kenworthy playing her boyfriend. This is the only casting news thus far, and the theme for the new season has yet to be announced.

Peters will next appear in this year’s X-Men romp Dark Phoenix, reprising his role of Quicksilver. lt’s unclear as to whether or not he’ll be returning for season 2 of Pose, FX’s other Ryan Murphy-Brad Falchuk joint production.

Related content:

American Horror Story

An anthology series that centers on different characters and locations, including a haunted house, an insane asylum, a witch coven, a freak show and a hotel.

Available For Streaming On

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2UbOV3P
via IFTTT

Michelle Williams was ‘paralyzed’ after learning costar Mark Wahlberg was paid more than her

Michelle Williams is opening up about the pay disparity she experienced while working with Mark Wahlberg on All the Money in the World.

The four-time Oscar nominee spoke on Capitol Hill Tuesday while advocating for House Democratic legislation that would close the gender pay gap.

Williams joined Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus to mark Equal Pay Day as she recounted discovering Wahlberg, 47, had made $1.5 million compared to her paycheck of less than $1,000 for reshoots on the Ridley Scott film.

“It’s the kind of story I would normally resist: the morality tale with a happy ending, or rather a happy beginning because that’s really why I’m here,” Williams said. “There won’t be satisfaction for me until I can exhaust my efforts ensuring that all women experience the elevation of their self-worth and its connection to the elevation of their market worth.”

“In late 2017, the news broke that I’d been paid less than $1,000 compared to the $1.5 million that my male counterpart had received for the exact same amount of work,” she continued. “And guess what, no one cared. This came as no surprise to me, it simply reinforced my life-learned belief that equality is not an inalienable right and that women would always be working just as hard for less money while shouldering more responsibility at home.”

Williams said she was “paralyzed in feelings of futility” after learning of the pay disparity.

RELATED: Inside Why Mark Wahlberg Was Paid Over 1,000 Times More Than Michelle Williams: Report

“I’ve been a working actress since the age of 12. I’ve been accredited by my industry at the highest levels and that still didn’t translate to equal compensation. Months passed and the actress Jessica Chastain, with whom I had in fact played sisters, offered to take my story to her Twitter,” Williams said.

She added, “Jessica’s audience was much wider than mine and she wasn’t afraid to pick up a megaphone and be heard. Heard she was, there was an uproar and a public shaming within my industry that resulted in a $2 million donation to the Time’s Up Defense Fund.”

Williams said the events had changed her time on movie sets.

“I could tell my workplace was shifting. Rather than being grasped too tightly or hugged for too long as a morning greeting, my hand was shaken and I was looked squarely in the eye and I was welcomed to my Monday morning,” she said.

Williams added, “On the job I just completed two weeks ago, I have to tell you, I was paid equally with my male costar.”

In a report by USA Today, it was revealed Wahlberg had made $1.5 million for extensive reshoots on the film, while Williams received only a per diem of $80 a day.

According to an industry insider who spoke to TheWrap in 2018, Williams’ original contract required her to do any necessary reshoots, while Wahlberg’s did not. So when Scott called for 10 days of reshoots after the movie’s original star, Kevin Spacey, was replaced by Christopher Plummer, Wahlberg had the opportunity to negotiate additional pay.

And while both Williams and Wahlberg immediately agreed to participate in the reshoots, the actor’s agent reportedly told the film financiers he “never” works for free, according to a source who spoke with TMZ. Wahlberg’s agent Ari Emanuel (the co-CEO of WME) set the price, to which film execs eventually agreed, per TheWrap.

After the news broke, Williams weighed in on the personal sacrifices she made for the reshoots, admitting she missed Thanksgiving with her daughter in order to work.

“I had to break the news to my family and tell them I wasn’t going be home [for the holidays] and make alternate arrangements for them,” she told Vulture in 2018. “But everyone was so supportive, no one more than my 12-year-old daughter, who said, ‘You worked so hard on this. Don’t let it be ruined because of one bad man.’”

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2FMItGB
via IFTTT

Duke’s Zion Williamson, RJ Barrett Headline 2019 AP All-America 1st Team

CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA - MARCH 16: Teammates RJ Barrett #5 and Zion Williamson #1 of the Duke Blue Devils react after defeating the Florida State Seminoles 73-63 in the championship game of the 2019 Men's ACC Basketball Tournament at Spectrum Center on March 16, 2019 in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

Streeter Lecka/Getty Images

Duke Blue Devils freshmen Zion Williamson and RJ Barrett headlined the 2019 Associated Press All-America squads.

The squads were announced Tuesday, and Murray State star Ja Morant also earned a first-team spot.

               

2019 AP All-America Teams

First Team 

Zion Williamson, Duke, Freshman

Grant Williams, Tennessee, Junior

RJ Barrett, Duke, Freshman 

Ja Morant, Murray State, Sophomore

Cassius Winston, Michigan State, Junior

          

Second Team

Rui Hachimura, Gonzaga, Junior

Jarrett Culver, Texas Tech, Sophomore

Markus Howard, Marquette, Junior

Ethan Happ, Wisconsin, Senior

Carsen Edwards, Purdue, Junior

          

Third Team

De’Andre Hunter, Virginia, Junior

Dedric Lawson, Kansas, Junior

Brandon Clarke, Gonzaga, Junior

PJ Washington, Kentucky, Sophomore

Kyle Guy, Virginia, Junior

          

This is just the latest individual honor for Williamson, who was named the ACC Player and Rookie of the Year, made the All-ACC first team and took home the Wayman Tisdale Award as the nation’s top freshman after he averaged 22.6 points, 8.9 rebounds, 2.1 steals and 1.8 blocks per game.

Barrett had a strong performance as well, averaging 22.6 points, 7.6 rebounds and 4.3 assists per contest. While a knee injury sidelined Williamson down the stretch, Barrett averaged 26.2 points over six games. He too earned All-ACC honors.

The Williamson-Barrett duo led the Blue Devils to a 32-6 record, an ACC tournament title, the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament and an Elite Eight appearance.

Not to be overshadowed, Morant was the Ohio Valley Conference Player of the Year and averaged 24.5 points, 10.0 assists and 5.7 rebounds per game. He led the Racers to a 28-5 record and a spot in the second round of the NCAA tournament.

With 17 points, 16 assists and 11 rebounds in a first-round victory over Marquette, Morant became just the eighth player since 1984 to record a triple-double in the Big Dance.

Grant Williams was named the SEC Player of the Year after he led the Tennessee Volunteers in both scoring (18.8 ppg) and rebounding (7.5 rpg). In January, Tennessee earned a No. 1 AP ranking for just the second time in school history. The Volunteers went 31-6 before they bowed out in the Sweet 16.

Michigan State star Cassius Winston rounded out the first team after he averaged 18.9 points and 7.6 assists per game as a junior. The 6’1″, 185-pound guard guided the Spartans to a share of the Big Ten regular-season title as well as the conference tournament championship.

Winston is the only member of the first team whose season is still alive. Michigan State will take on Texas Tech in the Final Four on Saturday after the Spartans upset Williamson, Barrett and Duke in the Elite Eight.

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2OGPSLw
via IFTTT

Police arrest suspect in Nipsey Hussle killing

The man who is suspected of fatally shooting rapper Nipsey Hussle is in custody, authorities say.

Los Angeles police arrested the man Tuesday, and have confirmed that he is 29-year-old Eric Holder. The LAPD previously named Holder as the sole shooter wanted for homicide in the case.

Hussle, whose legal name was Ermias Joseph Asghedom, died Sunday after being shot on the street where his clothing store, the Marathon Clothing Company, is located in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Los Angeles. He was 33. Two other victims were involved, according to authorities.

LAPD Chief Michel Moore told reporters that Holder “walked up on multiple occasions” to Hussle and the other men who were with him, before returning with a handgun and opening fire. Moore added that Holder and Hussle had been involved in a personal dispute, but did not offer further details.

Moore also offered new information on the stampede that broke out at a memorial service outside Hussle’s clothing store on Monday. According to Moore, an unidentified man brandished a handgun and another person tried to disarm him, prompting a panic which resulted in the stampede. Multiple injuries were reported, but so far there is no evidence that any shots were fired.

Related content:

Read More

from Update News Bulletin https://ift.tt/2FTwuYR
via IFTTT